- Our field service software already tracks warranty jobs.
- Some of it does, which is exactly why the audit starts from your export rather than from a new system. Your platform holds the job, the serial and the install date. What no platform we know of does on its own is compare each warranty-flagged job against the manufacturer's published filing window and tell you which ones are still live this week. If yours already produces that register, you do not need us and we will say so on the scope call.
- Why would we trust you with our job data?
- Do not trust us with anything expensive on the first pass. The audit takes a read-only export and returns a document. We never touch your dealer portal, we never ask for a password, we do not talk to your manufacturer, and we move nothing in your system. If the register comes back wrong you have lost $600 and a CSV export, and you will know it is wrong inside an hour, because the serials and the dates are yours.
- Why $600?
- It buys roughly a day of skilled review across up to 180 days and three brands, plus up to twelve drafted claim packets and a screen share walking your office manager through the first three submissions. The only published price we found for a comparable HVAC warranty credit audit is $500 one time, and it covers record review and workspace setup rather than drafted packets (operlay.com, read 07 September 2026). Your other alternative is your office manager's time, which is not free and is already spent.
- What do you actually need from us?
- The 180-day export with serials and service dates, a photo of the returns bin, your brand list and dealer numbers, and about forty minutes of your office manager's time across two calls. That is the whole ask. If pulling the export turns into a project, we stop and tell you, because a useful review starts from records you already have rather than from new data entry.
- Who talks to our customers?
- Nobody. We do not contact your customers, your distributor or your manufacturer at any point. Every conversation in this engagement is between us and the two people you name.
- What if it goes wrong?
- The likeliest failure is that the audit finds very little live money, and there is a stop rule for it: if the first pass shows fewer than five claimable jobs still inside their window, we tell you before we finish and you can close the engagement at the scope-review stage instead of paying for a thin report. If a packet we drafted is rejected, we will tell you why we think it was rejected and what a corrected packet would need. We do not appeal claims and we do not promise that any claim will be approved. The manufacturer decides every claim, not us.
- Why not put a VA on it, or use a warranty processing company?
- A virtual assistant is a reasonable choice once you already know which jobs are claimable, because at that point the work is data entry. This is not that. The work is deciding, per job, whether the window is still open and whether the evidence is complete, which needs someone who has read the dealer terms and can read a job export. Against an outsourced warranty back office the difference is scope and disclosure: they price on volume, quote by phone, and run continuously. This is one fixed-price pass with a published number and a named reviewer, and then it ends.